Why did AP call Iowa Caucuses early for Trump? Mike Berland worked with President Bill Clinton, Senator Hillary Clinton and Mayor Michael Bloomberg and he explains how the AP made the call and why pollsters like himself rarely use polls to predict results for national elections.
Berland is a political powerhouse. He goes into detail on what the Iowa caucus results really show, and why Nikki Haley despite a 3rd place finish is the most notable candidate with momentum. At the end of the show, he gives listeners an inside look into Hillary Clinton’s Iowa Caucus loss to Barack Obama.
Iowa stories for your inbox
Justin, David, & Kaylee cover Iowa news, agriculture, business and tech. No clickbait. No rage. No agenda. Support our vision and subscribe!
Why did AP call Iowa Caucuses early for Trump?
30 minutes. That’s how long it took for The AP to call the Iowa Caucuses for Donald Trump. But why did AP call Iowa Caucuses early for Trump? And how?
Berland, who is a senior partner at Penta Group, discussed various aspects of political strategy and polling, emphasizing the importance of data in political strategy, stating that everything starts with data. He criticized the Associated Press (AP) for calling the Iowa caucuses too early, suggesting that it violated the principle of letting people vote before declaring a winner. Berland predicts a rule change, similar to the one for network news, where a caucus cannot be called before every vote is cast.
He did say however, the reason the AP was able to call the race so accurately is due to their own data aligning so tightly with entry polling. Media is under immense pressure to be first, so they devote quite a few resources to high profile calls like The Iowa Caucuses.
Donald Trump’s New Strategy
He also discussed the dynamics of the Republican primaries, highlighting Donald Trump’s disciplined campaign strategy—a shift from the last cycle. He noted that Trump, unlike in previous campaigns, is now responding to his competitors rather than initiating attacks, demonstrating control. This approach, according to Berland, is more akin to a business strategy where one lets the opponent speak first.
Regarding other candidates, Berland pointed out that they are not criticizing Trump’s policies but rather suggesting a change in leadership while maintaining those policies. He believes that if the electorate wants Trump’s policies, they should elect Trump for his leadership.
Why vision matters
Berland also touched on the importance of having a vision for the future and the ability to implement it to gain voter trust. He mentioned that Trump’s past successes as president give him an edge in this regard.
Looking ahead, Berland discussed the potential for Nikki Haley to emerge as a strong contender. He noted her increasing popularity and the importance of upcoming primaries in shaping the race. Berland emphasized that momentum is the key factor in political races, not simply a caucus victory. Despite Haley’s momentum though, Trump’s performance in Iowa demonstrates his strong position and likely path to become the GOP Nominee.
In summary, Berland’s insights reflect a deep understanding of political strategy, the significance of data and polling in shaping campaigns, and the dynamics of the current Republican primary race.